NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Jul 2012 13:19:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
+1

On 13 Jul 2012, at 11:14, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> No way. There is no reason there can’t be another round a year after this one. Whether it’s one year or two yeras, the whole process should be regular and predictable, not a repeat of the idiotic nightmare we just went through.

In fact one of the primary principles which the GNSO mandated was that the process be regular and predictable.


>  
>> It's probably another decade at least before round 2 unfolds.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2