NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rosemary Sinclair <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:27:40 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Interesting - what is the status of the Interim Charter? Only a Work in Progress doc?? Then everyone is bound by Board approved Charter?



Cheers



Rosemary

------Original Message------

From: Andrew A. Adams

To: Rosemary Sinclair

Cc: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: [NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS] SPAM-LOW: Constituencies, old and new

Sent: Nov 12, 2010 2:46 PM



> so now we have to chat about "grandfathering provisions" and need a new cla=

> use in the proposed Charter which is clear on our position that any Constit=

> uency however approved that is a part of NCSG is bound by the Charter rules=

>  of NCSG....



However, if the NPOC is approved as a constituency under the current interim 

NCSG charter and gains certain voting rights under it )as is my reading of 

the interim charter - please correct me if I:m wrong) which it would then 

lose under a new charter, then it gives the NPOC a significant incentive to 

block adoption of the revised charter, and a platform on which to do so. Yet 

another reason why approval of the NPOC under the interim charter should not 

happen.



 



-- 

Professor Andrew A Adams                      [log in to unmask]

Professor at Graduate School of Business Administration,  and

Deputy Director of the Centre for Business Information Ethics

Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan       http://www.a-cubed.info/













Sent from my BlackBerry® from Optus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2