And today is the last day.
 Does nobody in this SG have time for this issue?
  Or do we just not care.

a.


On 24 Sep 2010, at 15:57, Alex Gakuru wrote:

> Greetings,
> 
> We could really do with an NCUC/SG comment to PDP-WT. All others have commented except us. This is to only to support Avri's appeal on this.
> 
> thanks.
> 
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Once again in a PDP meeting.  Once again asked it thee would be a comment from the NCSG.
> 
> Comment period close 30 September.  For real this time.  Enough extensions already.
> 
> We still do not have a volunteer to actually do a report.  Lots of people have volunteered to review one, but someone has to do the initial work.  Alex and I are parts of the group so I do not feel we can take the lead.
> 
> I still think this is a critical piece of policy process we really should review as a SG.
> 
> I entreat you all, please take a look at: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#pdp-initial-report
> 
> and comment.  Please also let me/the_list if you are doing this.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> On 2 Sep 2010, at 10:05, Avri Doria wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am sitting in the PDP work team meeting and was asked whether we intend to submit a review to the new PDP processes.
> >
> > http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#pdp-initial-report
> >
> > Is anyone willing?  The deadline has been moved for one last extension to Sept 30.
> >
> > BTW: I am on the WT and thus even if I wanted to comment, i don't believe I should be the one to do so. i tend to believe that those in a group have enough opportunity to make their points and comments should be generated by others.  I think this stuff s important to NCSG since that is how all of the policy gets made and these changes may have an effect on how we work.
> >
> > a.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Everything about this list: http://info.n4c.eu/sympa/info/ncsg-policy
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> regards,
> 
> Alex Gakuru
> http://www.mwenyeji.com
> Hosting, surprise yourself!