NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 5 May 2007 00:29:44 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
hi,

might also be worth doing/contributing a proper analysis of the  
survey and its methodology, if someone has the time and inclination.

a.

On 4 maj 2007, at 16.22, Robin Gross wrote:

> Given the biased nature of the "questionnaire".   Perhaps we should  
> abstain?    Or at least those of us who are so inclined,  like myself.
>
> Robin
>
>
> Milton Mueller wrote:
>
>> I took the survey about a week ago. It sucks. It takes a long time
>> because it asks about individual TLDs. As a social science researcher
>> the assumptions and biases built into the questions are extremely
>> obvious.
>>
>>>>> Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]> 5/2/2007 12:31 PM >>>
>>>>>
>> I'm aware that the registrars constituency has been in
>> receipt of this survey since April 20 (with a
>> requested return date by COB May 1).
>> In my view, NCUC members should each fill out the
>> survey and return them individually to Liz Williams
>> today.  The survey has 26 questions; it shouldn't take
>> long to complete.
>>
>> by email to liz.williams[at]icann.org by fax to Liz at +32 2 234 7848
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around  
>> http://mail.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2