NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Sep 2016 18:12:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
All,

We had an election where the terms of the election were clear to all. 
Some of us did not like the way NOTA was handled in the election and 
have asked the NCSG EC review that, as well as review other election 
format issues.

It is not at all productive to question why individual voters voted as 
they did, wondering if they were confused or unduly swayed by this or 
that posting. If we have suggestions about a better format for NCSG 
elections, we should convey those ideas to the NCSG EC. There they will 
be deliberated in an open and transparent manner such that we arrive at 
a clear consensus with regard to the way elections are handled in the 
future. In the mean time there is ample other business to attend to.

On 9/5/2016 5:50 PM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:

................[deleted]...............

Sam L.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2