NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:20:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
I think that is a great question and I am stunned to learn that we have 
that many new policy staffers...
Stephanie

On 2016-02-26 7:16, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> I would like to talk with them about work flow. ICANN has hired 100 
> policy staffers in the last year and has an enormous new capability 
> for work flow, but we do not. There is no way to keep up with what is 
> "in the queue" and "coming down the pike."
>
> I would expressly invite David Olive (as lead of ICANN's Policy 
> Development Support Team) to be part of this discussion as well. How 
> do we make the work load reasonable if we want the volunteer, 
> multistakeholder model to continue? Is it based on ICANN capacity or 
> stakeholder capacity?
>
> Best,
> Kathy
>
> On 2/26/2016 6:10 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> One regular event at ICANN meetings is that we get to meet the Board,
>> talk with them about and ask them whatever we want.
>>
>> The Board would, however, like to know in advance what we're going
>> to ask them, so they could better prepare for it.
>>
>> If you have suggestions for topics for our meeting with the Board in
>> Marrakech, please let me know as soon as possible (feel free to post
>> to the list or me directly, as you prefer).
>>
>> Thank you,
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2