NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:20:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Tapani,
Just for clarification:

Do you mean that the ballot is spoiled and not counted at all, or
do you mean that only the NOTA vote is "invalid" and the rest of the 
ballot counts?

Sam

On 8/24/2016 1:07 PM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:59:15PM -0400, Sam Lanfranco ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>
>> I agree that this is how it is now supposed to work, but what happens if
>> someone votes for all candidates, and NOTA?
> In that case the vote is invalid.
>
> Technically it would apparently be possible to notify the voter of
> this situation and ask him or her to vote again. We discussed this but
> didn't decide if that should be done, as time ran out.
>


-- 
------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
in an unjust state" -Confucius
  邦有道,贫且贱焉,耻也。邦无道,富且贵焉,耻也
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
email: [log in to unmask]   Skype: slanfranco
blog:  http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852

ATOM RSS1 RSS2