Thanks Avri,
Sounds good to me -- it fits with our broader framework and the
rights-impact analysis we've made a part of the PDP.

--Wendy


On 10/13/2012 11:21 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> This is a change I am recommending me made to the thick Whois motion.  
> Mikey is willing to accept it as a friendly amendment, but will be socializing it on the DT list.
> 
> Hopefully the NCSG g-council members can support this.
> 
> avri
> 
> Ref; http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/thick-whois-charter-08oct12-en.pdf
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Appropos out conversation last night
>> Date: 13 October 2012 11:02:45 EDT
>> To: Mike O'Connor <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> My view on the charter on whois is that one of the lines should be edited
>>
>> This point 
>>
>> "
>> Impact on privacy and data protection: how would ‘thick’ Whois affect privacy and data protection, also taking into account the involvement of different jurisdictions with different laws and legislation with regard to data privacy as well as possible cross border transfers of registrant data?
>> "
>>
>> should be ammended to something like:
>>
>> Impact on rights: how would ‘thick’ Whois affect rights such as Privacy, Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Association as well as adherence to data protection regulations,  taking into account the involvement of different jurisdictions with different laws and legislation with regard to data privacy as well as possible cross border transfers of registrant data?
>>
>>
>> avri
> 


-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask] +1 617.863.0613
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
Visiting Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project
http://wendy.seltzer.org/
https://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/