NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 23:32:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
On 1 Mar 2012, at 20:55, Alain Berranger wrote:

> The third topic has been flogged to death already

I thought the isue was still very much alive.

> and will occupy much space in San José as is - also what new elements that have not been discussed before can be brought forward by NCUC?

This is a chance for the NCUC, as well as the NPOC, to make their views known to the board without the filtering of consensus based language.
And a chance for the Board to have answer to how it found it within its by-laws purview to unilaterally change the policy without consulting the GNSO.

avri

ATOM RSS1 RSS2