NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:16:29 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Hey Sam,



What was the 600 page contract? I haven’t seen any agreements of that size yet, would love to see what they threw into the NYC one!



-James









On 29/09/2015 14:02, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Sam Lanfranco" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:



>Part of the power and knowledge imbalance between the new-gTLD 

>"incumbent crowd", sitting like vultures (or hawks) on the sidelines and 

>the "newbie crews" in Latin American, Asia and Africa will require more 

>than just a re-balancing of access to resources to get into the game. It 

>will also require greater knowledge and capacity to deal with that 

>"incumbent crowd" when it shows up with offers to manage the submission 

>process and registry services. That New York City willingly signed on to 

>a 600 page contract with minimal stakeholder consultation, a contract 

>that brought on a multitude of problems, should be a warning here. There 

>needs to be a focused outreach effort to address questions and issues, 

>so that applicants operate from a position of strength above and beyond 

>just financial support.

>

>Sam Lanfranco

>

>On 29/09/2015 12:31 AM, Avri Doria wrote:

>> Hi,

>>

>> I really like the question about remediation for the developmental

>> imbalance before moving on with new rounds for the  incumbent crowd.

>>

>> avri

>>

>>

>> On 28-Sep-15 18:58, Marilia Maciel wrote:

>>> Hi, I would like to support the topics suggested by Niels and Remmy,

>>> but I would take Remmy's point in a slightly different direction.

>>>

>>> Nielsen's report confirms that Latin America, Asia and Africa will

>>> likely be the great drivers of new gTLD acceptance and use, while most

>>> registries are still based in developed regions. There is a net

>>> transference of resources taking place from the developing to the

>>> developed world in the DNS industry. The problems that developing

>>> regions face have been extensively explained.  What is the perception

>>> of the board? In the opinion of board members, which concrete measures

>>> could be put in place? Why not even suggestions from the JAS report

>>> have been implemented yet? Would the board commit to a clear plan to

>>> address the current imbalances before a new round of applications is

>>> launched?

>>>

>>> My two cents.

>>>

>>> Best,

>>> Marília

><rest deleted>

>>> ------------------------------------------------

>>> "It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured

>>> in an unjust state" -Confucius

>>> ------------------------------------------------

>>> Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)

>>> Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3

>>> email: [log in to unmask]   Skype: slanfranco

>>> blog:  http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com

>>> Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852


ATOM RSS1 RSS2