NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Marc Schneiders <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Marc Schneiders <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 02:30:11 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (24 lines)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, at 19:30 [=GMT-0500], [log in to unmask] wrote:

> Note that we have
> eliminated domain creation and expiration dates.
> We believe that the inclusion of that information promotes
> spamming and manipulative or fraudulent service offerings
> from competing registrars.

So do I.

> We can think of no legitimate purpose
> that is served by requiring that information to be public;

I can. What other evidence is there for registrants about the
registration period for their domains other than whois? There is no
paperwork. We cannot simply abolish whois and leave things to the
goodwill of registrars. Whois is flimsy evidence, but it is something.
It will be easier for registrars and their resellers (including
fraudulent "businesses") to fool people with renewal notices when
there is no public check for the expiry date of a domain.

--
Marc Schneiders

ATOM RSS1 RSS2