NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
AW: [NCSG-Discuss] April 10 Board meeting
From:
"Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
"Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:43:19 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines) 
This is not fun anymore. We should organoze a workshop during the IGF in Baku about individual Freedom of Expression and IPR.
 
wolfgang 

________________________________

Von: Adam Peake [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Gesendet: Mo 16.04.2012 06:58
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] April 10 Board meeting


more Olympic rights fun <http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/apr/13/olympics-2012-branding-police-sponsors>  Bit off topic.   

Adam



On Monday, April 16, 2012, Avri Doria wrote:


	Hi,
	
	What's to discuss?
	We presented arguments.
	And they were heard.
	
	Avri
	
	Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
	
	>I am surprised there is not more discussion of these resolutions on
	>this list.
	>The good news is that in both cases, the board's action coincides with
	>NCSG positions, and in the case of the second resolution, I think our
	>work played a role in making the decision.
	>
	>My analysis of the board resolutions here:
	>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2012/04/14/when-no-action-is-the-wisest-action-icann-does-good/
	>
	>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2