NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Konstantinos Komaitis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantinos Komaitis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:00:28 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
I would also add to that (and apologies for coming in late) - there are
serious trademarks concerns that have not been really expressed. Like for
instance, will Time Warner be able to take .time? There needs to be some
form of legitimate restrictions as applied in trademark law.

Konstantinos


On 09/03/2010 14:06, "Wendy Seltzer" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Milton L Mueller wrote:
>> Hi, it would be nice to know more about what the rationale for this position
>> is. Not that I oppose it, it's just that the EoI proposal has been kicking
>> around since October and no one here has expressed any positions on it or
>> interest in it. Obviously you had a discussed there, please let us know what
>> you mean by a "pre-launch application" and I'd especially like to know how
>> you respond to one of the arguments I have heard in favor of the EoI
>> proposal:
>> - it provides information about what is really out there, thus providing a
>> counter to GAC and TM-lobby promoted FUD about all the problems a new TLD
>> round is likely to cause
> 
> When the EoI becomes a mandatory declaration of intent to participate,
> combined with a serious financial commitment, without greater clarity of
> process from the ICANN side, it seems unfair to many who would like to
> participate.  I'd rather channel that energy back into advancement of
> the actual gTLD introduction.
> 
> --Wendy
> 
> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Non-Commercial User Constituency [[log in to unmask]] On
>> Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer [[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 7:27 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCSG statement on the EoI
>> 
>> The assembled NCSG in Nairobi agreed to endorse this statement regarding
>> Expressions of Interest:
>> 
>> As it has been described here, the "Expression of Interest" is in fact a
>> "Pre-Launch Application" before ICANN is willing to make contractual
>> promises. The NCSG does not support a Pre-Launch Application under these
>> circumstances.
>> 
>> --

-- 
Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
Lecturer in Law,
GigaNet Membership Chair,
University of Strathclyde,
The Lord Hope Building,
141 St. James Road,
Glasgow, G4 0LT,
UK
tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
email: [log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2