NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:03:46 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
At 4:23 PM +0300 28/6/11, Alex Gakuru wrote:
>It would be very sad if we lost the true meaning of "consumer" to 
>large/corporate users.

	Whatever we call them, organisations like INTUG (that 
Rosemary was formerly Chair of) I think would be very valuable within 
ICANN, have a very valid role to play, and clearly are in support of 
the consumer agenda theough they represent mostly business users of 
telecomms not individuals. I fully support such organisations being 
represented within ICANN.
	But as commercial users, while they have more in common in 
attitude with NCSG, they technically belong in CSG. Hence we have a 
problem - how is NCSG to support such organisation without admitting 
them as members?
	I think working to a constructive solution to this issue 
would be more valuable than either ignoring the issue or moving ahead 
with a constituency strategy that doesn't take into acocunt some 
really valuable organisations.
	Regards
		David

ATOM RSS1 RSS2