NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:41:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
This is a good suggestion. Except I still rankle at the selection of an academic Nomcom representative by the Board while commercial groups are allowed to choose both of their own. --MM

> -----Original Message-----
> How about proposing GNSO will provide six nomcom
> delegates, two from the contracted parties, and
> two each from the commercial and noncommercial
> SG.  One of non-commercial SG delegates being
> selected by the NCUC and the other by the board
> until transition is complete when the task passes
> to the NCSG (note, this is the status quo for
> NCUC and registries/registrars.) Number of GNSO
> delegates would be reduced to six.
> 
> Would be good to mention something about ensuring
> geographic and gender diversity across the GNSO's
> delegate selections (hard to implement...)
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2