Hi all,

Regarding the staggered terms, I was accidentally aware of it and see no
problem with it. I suggest as a procedure for resolving the voting tie that
Marc and Jisuk play a virtual form of coin tossing to decide and let us know :)

Regarding meeting times, I guess rotation would be a sensible thing to do.
However, I agree with Milton's remarks on the importance of the preparatory
process towards each meeting, and will try as much as possible to be
present in this process on a regular basis.

--c.a.

At 21:35 25/11/2003, Milton Mueller wrote:
>Hi Jisuk,
>Good to hear from you directly.
>You raise good points about the terms and procedure.
>Let me add what I can to your questions:
>
> >>> Jisuk Woo <[log in to unmask]> 11/24/03 09:09AM >>>
> >I particularly did not understand why the issue regarding the term
> >of the members came up so late, after the election.
>
>We have always known that the first Council election
>would involve staggered terms (i.e., one person elected
>for one year, one for two years). I am sorry that the
>people convincing you to run were not aware of this.
>You can forgive them because it was buried in the
>ICANN by-laws concerning the new arrangements for
>transition to new Council structure.
>[...]