At 20:31 10/10/2013, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>Avri, so did (or it seems to have done) the ARIN fellow. This was signed
>as a statement of the "leaders" of whatever, so it saves them in a
>certain way from having their ears pulled when they return to their home
>bases, so to speak.

This has only one realistly serious explanation from gathered inputs.

Everyone in Montevideo was under the clear understanding that there 
was a metaconsensus. This is in disagreement with legal and 
democratic rules, but in agreement with MS spirit.
- OpenStand IEEE was not represented so it was purely an Internet affair.
- no one feared his constituants so the rough-metaconsensus had to be 
assumed to be deep in Boards and sub-leadership.

The reference to the IANA NTIA NOI by John Curan and other direct and 
indirect inputs clearly indicates the sopurce of inspiration of the 
metaconsensus. Leaders, together with the NTIA, have the clear common 
understanding that this is the correct move to maintain/protec/save 
the US StakeHolders market statUS-quo, bringing in the Telcos in 
support of the "family".

This is why I call this USSH Inc. The stakeholdership is in the US 
business. If this gurantees a stable internet due to further 
European, Asian, etc. other business stakeholderships competition it 
can be a good point for us, as long as we do not ally with one of 
them against the others.

jfc