Dear Cheryl,

I think that the proposed statement is very good and reflects the concerns of the NCUC. The only thing I would suggest is to title point 4 'transparency'. ICANN has made a promise to be and have processes in place that are transparent and this means that constituencies that are not able to self-fund themselves should be given the opportunity by ICANN to be present at the ICANN meetings.

Good work Cheryl.


Konstantinos

Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,

Lecturer IT & T Law,
University of Strathclyde,
The Law School, The Stenhouse Building,
170 Cathedral Street,
Glasgow, G4 0RQ
UK

email: [log in to unmask]
tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306



-----Original Message-----
From: Non-Commercial User Constituency on behalf of Cheryl Preston
Sent: Tue 6/24/2008 15:26
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: proposed statement on partial GNSO travel funding
 
How about the attached as a statement from the NCUC?

Cheryl B. Preston
Edwin M. Thomas
Professor of Law
J. Reuben Clark Law School
Brigham Young University
424 JRCB
Provo, UT  84602
(801) 422-2312
[log in to unmask]