NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Amber Sterling <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Amber Sterling <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:48:12 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Hi All,

I am compiling a list of questions posed regarding the NPOC charter and
will respond later today... the issue about whether or not the NPOC
would include "various national Chamber of Commerce or the International
Chamber of Commerce" is a non-starter.  The proposed NPOC would be a
constituency within the NCSG and therefore must meet NCSG membership
requirements.

Kind regards,
Amber

-----Original Message-----
From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Carlos A. Afonso
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:18 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Petition to form a new ICANN constituency

The way it is phrased now, yes, sure.

--c.a.

On 11/03/2010 10:58 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> On 3 Nov 2010, at 08:43, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>
>> The mission statement is phrased to involve *any* non-profit,
including business associations (non-profits which defend commercial
interests),
>
>
> Would this include the various national Chamber of Commerce or the
International Chamber of Commerce?
>
> Though the ICC is currently part of the BC, should we look forward to
them joining the NPOC?
>
> Thanks
>
> a.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2