NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Marc Schneiders <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Marc Schneiders <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:52:51 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (39 lines)
Anyone can contact registrants since whois is public, except
registries, by contract? Maybe ICANN should contract spammers? I am a
bit weary of the law talk here, I am sorry. Does one need a US law
degree to participate in ICANN?

On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, at 18:59 [=GMT-0500], Harold Feld wrote:

> It's been pointed out to me that at the moment, registries are barred by
> contract from contacting individual registrants.  Nevertheless, I think
> adding something about the advisability of sponsored TLDs consulting
> their community is a good idea.
>
> Milton Mueller wrote:
>
> >Well, then you make a good point, maybe the
> >NCUC statement could be modified to add something
> >about requiring sponsored TLDs to consult their
> >"community."
> >
> >>>>Harold Feld <[log in to unmask]> 01/08/04 06:52PM >>>
> >>>>
> >My thought was that where the issue could be approached with
> >granularity because of the community dynamic, this would be better.  But
> >in ICANN-land I suppose it is better to err on the side of uniformity
> >than flexibility.
> >
> >Harold
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2