Fine for me (just back home from the hospital ;-((( ).
 
wolfgang

________________________________

Von: NCSG-Discuss im Auftrag von William Drake
Gesendet: Do 05.09.2013 10:31
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Reply period closing on Delay of GNSO review decsion


Hi 


On Sep 5, 2013, at 6:42 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


	Hi
	
	The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 June.  At todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of NCSG endorsing the NPOC statement.
	
	What do people think about the following?
	


Look fine to me.

Thanks,

Bill



	I will ask the NCSG Policy  Committee to decide by  6 September whether they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name.
	
	Please comment.
	Any objections?
	Any edits?
	
	-----
	
	
	NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003..html> > against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews.
	
	The NCSG also support comments submitted by: 
	
	- ISPCP <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002..html> > 
	- Google <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001..html> >
	
	against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews.
	
	The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply:
	
	We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 2013, the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 without any further delay.
	
	
	-----
	
	I can't take complete silence as consent.  silence only works as consent when other people are being noisy.
	
	so please say something
	
	avri