NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:21:02 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (75 lines)
Why was the decision made to postpone the initiation
of a PDP on Domain Tasting?  

After more than two years of suffering abuse from
Domain Tasting practices, and after a fact-finding WG
had already completed its efforts with a final report
having been submitted, is it so very hard for the
Council to decide whether policy might need to be
crafted to deal with this issue?

I'm curious as to what position our councilors took on
this issue... did they support or reject this needless
delay?






--- Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Summary of this morning's GNSO Policy Council
> meeting:
> 
> The GNSO Council voted to post-pone it's decisions
> until the Open 
> Meeting in LA on 31 October on whether to initiate
> PDPs on both "Domain 
> Name Tasting" and also the issue of creating a
> dispute resolution 
> process for Inter-governmental Organizations.
> 
>     Intergovernmental Organization Dispute
> Resolution Process (IGO-DRP)
>    
>
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/gnso-igo-drp-report-v2-28sep07.pdf
> 
>     Domain Tasting report and decision on next step
>    
>
http://www.gnso.icann.org/drafts/gnso-domain-tasting-adhoc-outcomes-report-final.pdf
> 
> 
> ALSO, we need a volunteer from NCUC to represent us
> in this short term 
> planning group regarding the Registrar Transfer
> Policy Plan (see 
> below).   Any volunteers?    Ross Rader will lead
> this short-term 
> planning group.
> 
> Registrar Transfer Policy Plan:
>   On 20 September, the GNSO Council resolved:
>          iii). That the GNSO Council form a
> short-term planning group to 
> analyse and prioritize the policy issues raised in
> the report 
> "Communication to GNSO on Policy Issues Arising from
> Transfer Review" 
> before the Council further considers a PDP on any of
> the work discussed 
> in the report."
>     Report: 
>
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/Transfer-Policy-Issues-23aug07.pdf
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2