NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Adam Peake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Nov 2010 21:13:19 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
Dear Jorge,


At 6:43 AM -0500 11/4/10, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>Dear Amber,
>
>please, can you add to the list an answer explaining as a 
>representative of AAMC
>how much experience and participation did you have in ICANN and its policy
>development processes and what is the actual role of the Intellectual property
>administration and protection office at AAMC ?


Why is this relevant?

Constituency we're interested in, not the person, surely.

Adam




>Thanks & Regards
>Jorge
>
>On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Amber Sterling <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>  Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>>  Thank you for your questions and interest in the proposed NPOC.  At last
>>  count we had a dozen detailed questions.  We are working on a Q&A document
>>  (after a long work day) that addresses each of these questions in turn.  Our
>>  hope is that the single document will provide a better insight into the NPOC
>>  than answering the questions piecemeal.  As many of the questions require
>>  detailed and thoughtful responses in order to be meaningful we greatly
>>  appreciate your patience as we develop this document.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Kind regards,
>>
>>  Amber
>>
>>
>>
>>  Amber Sterling
>>
>>  Senior Intellectual Property Specialist
>>
>>  Association of American Medical Colleges

ATOM RSS1 RSS2