NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
James Gannon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 31 May 2016 20:11:37 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
I will note I also prefer collaborative environments that have at least though of UX and real world collaboration =)



-James









On 31/05/2016, 21:04, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Niels ten Oever" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:



>Hi Milton,

>

>Click 'settings' (symbol of cogwheel) in the upper right corner and then

>de-select 'authorship colors'.

>

>Enjoy the surveillance free collaborative environment!

>

>Cheers,

>

>Niels

>

>On 05/31/2016 09:58 PM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:

>> Niels, 

>> I feel "harassed" by a request to read a document that superimposes dark purple color over black text. 

>> Seriously, you are causing major eye strain for no apparent reason. Can you provide a legible version of this document? 

>> 

>> From what I can read, I would not support the proposed policy. 

>> 

>> --MM

>> 

>>> -----Original Message-----

>>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf

>>> Of Niels ten Oever

>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 11:55 AM

>>> To: [log in to unmask]

>>> Subject: Re: Public Comments - Revisions to ICANN Expected Standards of

>>> Behaviors

>>>

>>> Hi Brett,

>>>

>>> I made a screenshot of the etherpad so you can see different contributions,

>>> hope you can still get it working in your browser.

>>>

>>> I think the opinions are converging on the position that: the 'policy and

>>> procedures' and 'standards of behaviour' are interrelated and

>>> interdependent they should be presented jointly.

>>>

>>> I hope this is also what the statement conveys and we can gather around

>>> that, so we can discuss content of what this should be once both are

>>> developed and presented jointly.

>>>

>>> Cause I very much agree with you Brett, one cannot only have a carrot, one

>>> also needs a stick.

>>>

>>> And I also agree with Afsaneh that this stick cannot be used to wrongly inhibit

>>> freedom of speech.

>>>

>>> Best,

>>>

>>> Niels

>>>

>>> On 05/31/2016 03:26 PM, Schaefer, Brett wrote:

>>>> Niels,

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> I can’t read your response. Could you paste it into an e-mail?

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> In terms of the ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviors, my only comment

>>>> is that there is no explicit consequence listed, e.g. violation of

>>>> these standards will result in a probationary period and a second

>>>> violation will lead ICANN to deny in person registration/participation

>>>> to ICANN meetings.

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Best,

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Brett

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

>>>> --

>>>> BrettSchaefer

>>>> Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs

>>>> Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National

>>>> Security and Foreign Policy The Heritage Foundation

>>>> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE

>>>> Washington, DC 20002

>>>> 202-608-6097

>>>> heritage.org <http://heritage.org/>

>>>>

>>>> *From:*NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On

>>> Behalf

>>>> Of *Niels ten Oever

>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 31, 2016 6:01 AM

>>>> *To:* [log in to unmask]

>>>> *Subject:* Re: Public Comments - Revisions to ICANN Expected Standards

>>>> of Behaviors

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> It might not have been totally clear, but I would like to discuss this

>>>> as being an NCSG statement.

>>>>

>>>> Best,

>>>>

>>>> Niels

>>>>

>>>> On 05/31/2016 09:27 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:

>>>>> Dear all,

>>>>>

>>>>> I hope this email finds you all well. As you might have seen, the

>>>>> public comments to the Revisions to ICANN Expected Standards of

>>>>> Behaviors have been opened.

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>> https://www.icann.org/public-comments/expected-standards-revisions-

>>> 201

>>>> 6-05-16-en

>>>>>

>>>>> I have drafted an initial response here:

>>>>>

>>>>> https://pad.riseup.net/p/icannharassment

>>>>>

>>>>> Looking forward to discuss.

>>>>>

>>>>> Best,

>>>>>

>>>>> Niels

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> Niels ten Oever

>>>> Head of Digital

>>>>

>>>> Article 19

>>>> www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>

>>>>

>>>> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9

>>>>

>>>

>>> --

>>> Niels ten Oever

>>> Head of Digital

>>>

>>> Article 19

>>> www.article19.org

>>>

>>> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4

>>>                    678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9

>

>-- 

>Niels ten Oever

>Head of Digital

>

>Article 19

>www.article19.org

>

>PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4

>                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9


ATOM RSS1 RSS2