Hi,

Well I believe that the reason the called it Final New gTLD Applicant Guide Book instead of Final Applicant Guidebook is because after all the fuss of the Australian meaning of DAG, they did not want to deal with the various meanings of FAG.

Just imagine being accused of promoting smoking like that.

a.

On 13 Nov 2010, at 17:16, Joly MacFie wrote:

> So what acronym are we going to use now DAG is history.. just plain
> AG, or NAG, or, temporarily, PFNAG ???
> 
> j
> 
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: Glen de Saint Géry <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Date: 13 November 2010 04:27:12 EST
>>> To: GNSO Council <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Subject: [council] The Proposed Final New gTLD Applicant Guidebook is Available for Public Comment
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-12nov10-en.htm
>>> 
>>> The Proposed Final New gTLD Applicant Guidebook is Available for Public Comment
>>> http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/comments-5-en.htm
>>> 
> 
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
> WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
>  http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
>   Secretary - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>