NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alan Levin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alan Levin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:46:02 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Hi,

Sorry about my delayed response... just experienced some issues from my
side posting to the list.

I think points 1 and 2 are quite onerous (for any registrant) and will
add some level of (unneccesary) additional process to each
registration. As such I am not convinced that point 3 is required...

"3. Registrars must obtain a separate acknowledgement from registrars
that they have read and
understand these disclosures. This provision does not affect
registrars' existing obligations to
obtain registrant consent to the use of their contact information in
the WHOIS system."

- Is the second placement of 'registrar' supposed to read 'registrant'?
- What do you mean by 'separate acknowledgement'? (to me this sounds
like additional bureaucracy since it is complicated enough to register
a domain, just to understand how the system works takes much reading
and time, hence why most NCs rely on SPs)
- Why is this required in addition to points 1 and 2?

regards,

Alan

On 4 Jan 2005, at 06:33, Milton Mueller wrote:

> yep.
>
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois-privacy/whois-notification
> -30nov04.pdf
>
>>>> "Horacio T. Cadiz" <[log in to unmask]> 1/2/2005 8:55:34 AM >>>
> Could you also please post the URL of the text
> for the sake of everyone who wish to read it in full, for the sake of
> completeness?
>
>
---------------------------------------------
Alan Levin
Tel: +27 21 409-7997

ATOM RSS1 RSS2