NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 13:46:24 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I agree as well. Lets do something substantive that will make the 
history books.

On 11/7/2011 1:28 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> Amen, Robin.
> This is exactly right.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>> Of Robin Gross
>> Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 12:20 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] NCUC agenda =>  NCSG Interest Groups
>>
>> I think a lot of people are more interested in working on substantive policy
>> issues than in spending their time in constituency building exercises.  And if
>> we tell them they have to create a constituency first, then we lose a lot of
>> energy and expertise that is only concerned with the substantive policy
>> issues that noncommercial users face.  I think it is important not to
>> discourage those who would prefer to focus on the substantive policy issues
>> by requiring them to go form a constituency.  A flexible lightweight IG can
>> serve this purpose.
>>
>> Robin
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2