NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
avri doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
avri doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 25 Jun 2016 05:11:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (224 lines)
Hi,


I think the charter is clear that the NCSG-PC is the one to do make such
decisions:

https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Charter

> *2.5 The Policy Committee*
>
> The NCSG Policy Committee is responsible for:
>
>   * Discussion and development of substantive policies and statements
>     issued in the name of the NCSG. This activity will require
>     coordination with the membership and the Constituencies;
>   * Organize policy initiatives on behalf of NCSG membership,
>     including PDP initiatives from the membership;
>   * Provide policy research and guidance to NCSG representatives on
>     the GNSO Council;
>   * Keep membership informed of GNSO Council activities;
>   * Organize, appoint where appropriate, and track NCSG participation
>     in GNSO and other pertinent Working Groups.
>   * Organization and oversight of NCSG participation in any GNSO
>     Council-related tasks, whether mandated by Bylaws, Council
>     Procedures or Council decisions.
>   * Document methods and procedures used for decision-making. Such
>     documentation is subject to review by the NCSG‑EC.
>

avri


On 25-Jun-16 02:46, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>
> FWIW and without having any opinion about the letter, i have observed
> in the past where endorsements are suggested to be done individually
> and not as NCSG. From all indication it seem this particular one will
> be signed by NCSG? So two questions/comments
>
> 1. What's the process to determine whether to commit to stuffs like
> this as a group or not. Who makes the decision? The Chancellors? The EC?
>
> 2. What are the criteria that makes a statement qualified? Is it
> statements from organisations known by(or affiliated to) active
> participants?
>
> Cheers!
>
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>
> Hi
>
> I too would strongly support endorsing this Letter, which is squarely
> within the domain of our activity. IndeedCGI.br <http://cgi.br> has
> been a supporter of NCUC and related initiatives, as well as an
> exemplar of multi stakeholder collaboration and governance through
> years where this has been challenged at the national and global
> levels. If our support would be at all useful to them, they deserve to
> have it.
>
> Bill
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jun 24, 2016, at 22:35, Mueller, Milton L <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
>     > I would support this statement in principle. 
>
> >
> > Milton L Mueller
> > Professor, School of Public Policy
> > Georgia Institute of Technology
> >
> > On Jun 24, 2016, at 15:16, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> >
>
>     >> Hi
>
> >>
> >> As a grateful former student ofEGI.br <http://egi.br>, I'd support
> Carlos' ask for international organizations to sign this letter.
> >>
> >> Renata Aquino Ribeiro
> >> http://bit.ly/renataineng <http://bit.ly/renataineng>
> >>
> >> Em 24 de jun de 2016 14:34, "Carlos Afonso" <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> escreveu:
>
>     >>>
>
> >>> [sorry for possible duplicates]
> >>>
> >>> Note: given the recent transition in the Brazilian federal government
> >>> and the political uncertainties involved, a group of civil society and
> >>> academic organizations has produced this public declaration in defense
> >>> of the multistakeholder nature ofCGI.br <http://cgi.br> and its
> attributions.
> >>>
> >>> LETTER IN SUPPORT OF THE ATTRIBUTIONS AND MULTISTAKEHOLDER NATURE
> OFCGI.BR <http://CGI.BR>
> >>>
> >>> 24-6-2016
> >>>
> >>> The Internet Steering Committe of Brazil,CGI.br <http://cgi.br>, a
> multistakeholder
> >>> commission, has a crucial mission in the development of the
> Internet in
> >>> Brazil. In particular,CGI.br <http://cgi.br> supervises the
> actions ofNIC.br <http://nic.br> - a
> >>> non-profit private civil society organizationm in charge of
> carrying out
> >>> the management of all activities derived from policies defined by the
> >>> Committee. Decree Number 4829, of September, 2003, describes
> >>> attributions ofCGI.br <http://cgi.br>, which include:
> >>>
> >>> - proposing policies and procedures regarding the regulation of
> Internet
> >>> activities;
> >>>
> >>> - recommending standards for technical and operational procedures for
> >>> the Internet in Brazil;
> >>>
> >>> - establishing strategic directives related to the use and development
> >>> of the Internet in Brazil;
> >>>
> >>> - promoting studies and technical standards for network and service
> >>> security in the country;
> >>>
> >>> - coordinating the allocation of Internet addresses (IPs) in
> Brazil and
> >>> registration in the ".br" domain;
> >>>
> >>> - collecting, organizing and disseminating information on Internet
> >>> services, including indicators and statistics;
> >>>
> >>> - be represented in national and international technical forums
> related
> >>> to the Internet;
> >>>
> >>> - to adopt administrative and operational procedures so that Internet
> >>> governance in Brazil follows internationally accepted standards,
> >>> enabling it to celebrate agreements and partnerships.
> >>>
> >>> These activities, fully funded by private income derived from
> >>> distribution of domain names and IP numbers, are essential for the
> >>> operation and development of the Internet in Brazil. These
> attributions
> >>> are being carried out in a multistakeholder approach, with
> participation
> >>> of civil society, academia, technical community, private sector and
> >>> government.
> >>>
> >>> This pluralist feature has been the basis for the charter of
> principles
> >>> which is at the origin of the Brazilian Civil Rights Framework for the
> >>> Internet ("Marco Civil da Internet"). The success of this pluralist
> >>> practice has turnedCGI.br <http://cgi.br> into a worldwide
> reference on Internet
> >>> governance, considering that since its creation in 1995, and even
> in the
> >>> preparation of the Decree of 2003, any change in its structure and
> >>> operation has been preceded by broad consultations with society,
> >>> including significant participation of civil society and academic
> >>> organizations.
> >>>
> >>> In order to protect the stability, security and quality of the work
> >>> which has been and continues to be carried out and developed by the
> >>> Committee, the undersigned organizations affirm the centrality
> ofCGI.br <http://cgi.br>
> >>> to develop activities absolutely vital for the Internet of today and
> >>> tomorrow in the country, stressing the importance of preserving the
> >>> above attributions, as well as the pluralist, multissectorial
> nature of
> >>> CGI.br <http://cgi.br>.
> >>>
> >>> Actantes
> >>> Artigo 19
> >>> Barão de Itararé
> >>> Coding Rights
> >>> Colab-USP
> >>> Coletivo Digital
> >>> CTS-FGV
> >>> GPoPAI/USP
> >>> Ibase
> >>> Ibidem
> >>> InternetLab
> >>> Instituto Bem Estar Brasil
> >>> Intervozes
> >>> ITSRio
> >>> Lavits
> >>> Medialab.UFRJ
> >>> Nupef
> >>> ProTeste
> >>> Safernet Brasil
> >>> ULEPICC-BR
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Carlos A. Afonso
> >>> [emails são pessoais exceto quando explicitamente indicado em
> contrário]
> >>> [emails are personal unless explicitly indicated otherwise]
> >>>
> >>> Instituto Nupef -https://nupef.org.br <https://nupef.org.br>
> >>> CGI.br <http://cgi.br> -http://cgi.br <http://cgi.br>
> >>> ISOC-BR -https://isoc.org.br <https://isoc.org.br>
> >>>
> >>> GPG 0x9EE8F8E3
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> To manage your ISOC subscriptions or unsubscribe,
> >>> please log into the ISOC Member Portal:
> >>> https://portal.isoc.org/ <https://portal.isoc.org/>
> >>> Then choose Interests & Subscriptions from the My Account menu.
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2