NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Niels ten Oever <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Niels ten Oever <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:12:14 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (126 lines)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

ICANN.[anydomain] cannot be registered because there is a reserved
name list that is called out in the contract between every registry an
ICANN. I just found this out yesterday myself :)

Best,

Niels

On 03/18/2015 06:08 PM, Carlos Afonso wrote:
> I wonder if icann.sucks has already been preemptively registered?
> :-)
> 
> --c.a.
> 
> On 18-03-15 12:21, Nicolas Adam wrote:
>> Yes we (I) do, and unlimited freedom to create gTLDs should
>> 
>> 1) tell the suckers (there is no reason to sugar coat this) that
>> you can't buy yourself out of criticism
>> 
>> and
>> 
>> 2) prevent exorbitant prices for users who want to gleefully spew
>> on their most hatred brand of product.
>> 
>> So, yes. It's not only considered, it's the basis for my support
>> for unlimited gTLDs.
>> 
>> Nicolas
>> 
>> On 16/03/2015 12:32 PM, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>>> Do we consider this type of scam when some (most?) of us defend
>>> absolute freedom for creating new gTLDs?
>>> 
>>> --c.a.
>>> 
>>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [ PFIR ]
>>> Extortion runs wild on .sucks gTLD Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015
>>> 08:28:08 -0700 From: PFIR (People For Internet Responsibility)
>>> Announcement List <[log in to unmask]> Reply-To: PFIR (People For
>>> Internet Responsibility) Announcement List <[log in to unmask]> To:
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>> 
>>> Extortion runs wild on .sucks gTLD
>>> 
>>> ".sucks" registrations begin soon--at up to $2,500 per domain
>>> 
>>> (Ars): 
>>> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/03/sucks-tld-to-accept-sunrise-registrations-soon-but-theyll-be-pricey/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
The number of generic top-level domains (gTLDs) available for
>>> use has climbed into the hundreds, and ".sucks" will soon be
>>> added to the list. However, angry customers eager to get their
>>> hands on brand-specific domains like "bestbuy.sucks" or
>>> "comcast.sucks" shouldn't get their hopes up; according to
>>> MarketingLand, the domains will cost far more than most
>>> consumers will want to pay.  The pricing situation around
>>> .sucks domain names is complicated. Companies with registered
>>> trademarks will have to pay an astounding $2,499 to register
>>> their trademarked names in .sucks. Registration of 
>>> non-trademarked names during the "sunrise" period (March 30 
>>> until June 1) before .sucks goes live will cost at least $199
>>> per name, while the standard registration fee after June 1
>>> rises to $249 per name.
>>> 
>>> Companies are typically hyper-sensitive about brand usage, and 
>>> few will want their .sucks domains under someone else's
>>> control. The .sucks pricing scheme has led to outrage from many
>>> quarters, with MarketingLand's writeup quoting several industry
>>> figures who use words like "extortion" and "predatory."
>>> 
>>> - - -
>>> 
>>> This is one of the best examples I know of demonstrating how
>>> the gTLD expansion has turned into one giant extortion scheme
>>> for the enrichment of "domainers" and the rest of the
>>> domain-industrial complex -- and to the detriment of the Net at
>>> large. As far as the overwhelmingly vast majority of new gTLDs
>>> is concerned, I've seen nothing from them but spam and phishing
>>> attempts, and I block them from my networks with zero sense of
>>> shame and without any obvious detrimental effects here.
>>> Personally, I recommend that you do the same.
>>> 
>>> --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein ([log in to unmask]):
>>> http://www.vortex.com/lauren Founder: - Network Neutrality
>>> Squad: http://www.nnsquad.org - PRIVACY Forum:
>>> http://www.vortex.com/privacy-info Co-Founder: People For
>>> Internet Responsibility: http://www.pfir.org/pfir-info Member:
>>> ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog:
>>> http://lauren.vortex.com Google+:
>>> http://google.com/+LaurenWeinstein Twitter:
>>> http://twitter.com/laurenweinstein Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 /
>>> Skype: vortex.com
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ pfir mailing
>>> list http://lists.pfir.org/mailman/listinfo/pfir
>> 

- -- 
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVCbHuAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpJ0QH/i0gdvRCQIaRY3/T4ZKa8/h/
+2HJT7dvJSBCb+/Y8nFrIyyehYww/BfYO8QAOht3W0rq+apeWXiiN7BTXyuKg7Gl
vFbuEGLc9U7qtaawgTk1aUu/FBNIeCjqEw+BPVLHVW5THVh53dMgLyk4Btk4oWPs
2wtoMLN10lVU+80z7N/x3xWWeZHu2I00lGIBTqo+e7Kob7GCSUfCkivLUIF0cbIM
2coHNTb6DISqiYmhGzzNY68VwzkzRBT4tOy0yk0YTQ0WKHgdLEHlwlBZc4FuCrCs
fnUM6w9fipFhw9xSsUIhJ7BarmscxNkyjkdpRyrPrRsZggmRLaofnYAOxv2uKCc=
=2TfJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

ATOM RSS1 RSS2