NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Klaus Stoll <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Klaus Stoll <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:32:36 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Dear all

I agree with Tapani. We have to go with the due process as described by 
Tapani, I think nobody is happy with that but that is what we have to do 
if we want to stay legal.

Yours

Klaus


On 8/23/2016 2:19 PM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 03:56:45PM +0000, Mueller, Milton L ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>
>> If the appeal is not resolved, the entire election will be thrown out
> That is not true. The appeal will of course be resolved one way or
> another, but invalidating the election would need a new, separate
> process.
>
> Likewise, this will inevitably lead to the establishment of proper,
> well-defined procedures for next election, possibly also charter
> reform.
>
> And that is good.
>
> But as it is, election is ongoing.
>
> Some people would like to change the ballot mid-election.
>
> An appeal has been filed and will be processed in due course as
> described in our charter.
>
> But that is no reason to stop the election now.
>
> Just vote.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2