NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wendy Seltzer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Wendy Seltzer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Dec 2010 13:36:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
I would not endorse the conclusion of this statmeent.

In particular, I personally disagree with the statement that "we must
regretfully but categorically state that we consider the current PAG to
be unacceptable as presented, and against the best interest of Internet
end-users."  I would urge the approval of the AG now.

--Wendy

On 12/06/2010 12:01 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> 
> Evan has asked the NCCG/NCUC to consider endorsing the ALAC statement.
> 
> They expect to vote on it tomorrow, and Evan has indicated willingness to come in and speak to us.
> 
>>
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Draft+ALAC+Statement+on+Draft+Final+Applicant+Guidebook
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- [log in to unmask] +1 914-374-0613
Fellow, Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
http://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/donate        <<        please donate!
http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2