On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I just read the IO's comments and it appeared to me that he will NOT


I've re-read my post and it omitted a *NOT* that should have been
there,   apologies for the confusion.


object to any closed generics simply because they are closed. He also
refuted rather decisively the notion that a term such as .BOOK could
be objected to on community grounds, because there is not really a
book community but a variety of interests.
>
> As for your last question (Which applications has he objected to?  anyone know?) It is indeed somewhat confusing. The IO site does not have a clear, simple list of which specific strings/applications have been objected to, afaict

right, the closest he comes is :
http://www.independent-objector-newgtlds.org/english-version/the-independent-objector-s-comments-on-controversial-applications/


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel