On Sun, July 24, 2011 4:17 pm, Nicolas Adam wrote:
> I just want to say that i believe in the merit of this proposal. I am
> not for it because i believe that whatever
> ideological-axis-across-issues tribe i am in would gain some advantage
> by implementing it, or that on the contrary some other tribes would lose
> out.


Thanks Nicolas.  I just want to say that one reason I suggest we indicate
our constituency affiliations within NCSG is that I think *I* would
benefit by knowing what constituencies *others* are affiliated with, when
reading their posts here.  I'm modeling this behavior in hope that others
will follow suit (especially NPOC members).

Also, given that all these posts are open to the general public to read in
order to offer a measure of public transparency in ICANN policy-making, it
may also help someone not affiliated with ICANN to understand the context
more quickly when reading it on the web before becoming expert in ICANN
matters:

https://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A0=NCSG-DISCUSS

Dan, NCUC


-- 
Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author alone and
do not necessarily reflect any position of the author's employer.