NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:55:39 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (64 lines)
Lovely,  but this only relates to US information collection.

> We ask the NSA to immediately suspend collection of solely domestic communications pending the completion of a public rulemaking as required by law.

On 15 Jul 2013, at 17:27, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:

> OK, beyond the so-called circus, here is the excellent petition from Epic (http://epic.org/NSApetition) to the NSA:
> 
> Dear General Alexander and Secretary Hagel:
> 
> The undersigned individuals and organizations, concerned about the rule of law and the protection of Constitutional freedoms, hereby petition the National Security Agency to conduct a public rulemaking on the agency's monitoring and collection of communications traffic within the United States. 5 U.S.C. § 553(e).
> 
> We believe that the NSA's collection of domestic communications contravenes the First and Fourth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and violates several federal privacy laws, including the Privacy Act of 1974, and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 as amended.
> 
> The NSA's collection of solely domestic communications, which has been acknowledged by the President, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Chair and Ranking Member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, also constitutes a legislative rule that "substantively affects the public to a degree sufficient to implicate the policy interests animating notice-and-comment rulemaking" under the Administrative Procedure Act. EPIC v. DHS, 653 F.3d 1, 6 (D.C. Cir. 2011). Accordingly, the NSA's collection of domestic communications, absent the opportunity for public comment, is unlawful.
> 
> We hereby petition the National Security Agency, a component of the Department of Defense, for relief. We ask the NSA to immediately suspend collection of solely domestic communications pending the completion of a public rulemaking as required by law.
> 
> We intend to renew our request each week until we receive your response.
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
>   Marc Rotenberg
>   Dr. Alessandro Acquisti
>   James Bamford
>   Grayson Barber
>   Professor Ann Bartow
>   Professor Colin Bennett
>   Professor Christine Borgman
>   Professor Julie E. Cohen
>   Dr. Danah Boyd
>   Simon Davies
>   Dr. Whitfield Diffie
>   Dr. Cynthia Dwork
>   Professor David Farber
>   Addison Fischer
>   Professor David Flaherty
>   Professor Michael Froomkin
>   Professor Urs Gasser
>   Deborah Hurley
>   Professor Jerry Kang
>   Sheila Kaplan
>   Professor Ian Kerr
>   Rebecca MacKinnon
>   Mary Minow
>   Dr. Pablo Molina
>   Dr. Peter G. Neumann
>   Professor Helen Nissenbaum
>   Ray Ozzie
>   Deborah C. Peel, MD
>   Chip Pitts
>   Professor Anita Ramasastry
>   Professor Ronald Rivest
>   Professor Pam Samuelson
>   Bruce Schneier
>   Dr. Barbara Simons
>   Edward G. Viltz
> 
> --------
> 
> frt rgds
> 
> --c.a.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2