fyi

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [council] draft motion - response to NGPC letter - Rec
19/Spec 13
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:41:07 +0200
From: Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
To: GNSO Council List <[log in to unmask]>,  GNSO Secretariat
<[log in to unmask]>


Hi,

I received some outreach on the issue and wrote the following in
response.  As it applies to the discussion on this list, I decided to
forward it on, typos and all.

> At this point, I do not think I personally support the motion as
> written.
> 
> - While it is true that we did not specifically discuss .brand, we
> did discuss various forms of what could have been called single use
> gTLDs and never made any registrar exceptions for those.
> 
> - the VI decision allows for any .brand to also become a registrar
> and the rules allow for it to tailor the rules of registrars for
> specific registry limitations.
> 
> - I do not see how I can decry the use of non PDP originated
> decisions by the board in other cases, yet support it in this case.
> I advocate the need for a PDP to discuss the issue
> 
> - If we are to create exceptions I would be interested in seeing it
> go further to support other single use cases, such as an NGO that
> wanted to give registrations to its members.  My reading of Spec 13
> don't seem to go that far.
> 
> Having said that I will listen to the discussions, and ongoing
> discussion in NCSG and make up my mind later in the process.

avri