NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: +1's and support
From:
Niels ten Oever <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Niels ten Oever <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:46:43 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
On 08/03/2016 05:29 PM, Schaefer, Brett wrote:

> I disagree. The NCSG had various views on a number of issues in the
> transition proposal. I actually though that the councilors did a
> credible job of representing the diversity of views in the NCSG by
> dividing their votes.  
> 

Hi Brett,

I probably have missed the discussion on human rights (and how it
relates to North Korea) on the NCSG-list, could you point me to it?

Best,

Niels

ATOM RSS1 RSS2