NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Jul 2009 05:20:13 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (64 lines)
Here is the message I just sent to ORGs discussion list.

As an aside, has ORG been asked about involvement in NCUC?
Regards
	David

At 5:16 AM +0800 8/7/09, David Cake wrote:
>	I'll be unfamiliar to most of ORG, because I'm an Australian, 
>on the board of Electronic Frontiers Australia over here. But some 
>issues are global, and require global coordination from like minded 
>organisations, so I'm reaching out to ORG members to see if ORG can 
>help with an issue.
>	ICANN, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and 
>Numbers, is the body that oversees and sets policy for domain names 
>on the internet. It is currently preparing to allow many more 
>generic top level domain names (gTLDs), and deciding on the policies 
>that registries for these new top level domains will have to abide 
>by.
>	As part of that process, a group consisting of trademark 
>lawyers and professionals created a report on protecting trademark 
>owners rights. Many people believe that report goes too far, 
>introducing new rights for trademark owners and heavily slanting the 
>process in their favour, and impacting free speech rights. It 
>includes special rights for large trademark holders, a new process 
>for fast takedown of domain names based on trademark infringement, 
>and would commit ICANN to incorporating intellectual property 
>enforcement into domain registration. This proposal has been rushed 
>through with minimal opportunity for comment so far, so it is vital 
>that criticism and comment from those who believe in free speech and 
>balance in intellectual property enforcement is heard now. The NCUC 
>(Non Commercial Users Constituency), the group within ICANN where 
>most civil rights and free speech organisations with goals similar 
>to ORG are found, is trying to make sure voices critical of this 
>proposal are heard, and we need help from people who can attend the 
>various consultation sessions being held on the issues, including an 
>upcoming session in London.
>	There will be a New gTLDs global outreach and consultation 
>event in London on 15 July 2009 at the Royal Institute of British 
>Architects, 66 Portland Place, London, W1B 1AD.  It's free an open 
>to anyone interested in the issue and having their say.
>	Registration at <http://www.registration123.com/ICANN/GTLD/>
>http://www.registration123.com/ICANN/GTLD/
>	Agenda for London meeting
>http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/london-agenda-speakers-15jul09-en.pdf
>	If anyone who is interested in the issue can attend, we think 
>it would be really valuable. If you'd be interested in coordinating 
>comments with other non-commercial organisations with a similar 
>agenda, and getting some introduction to the issues, Konstantinos 
>Komaitis <[log in to unmask]> from NCUC will be at the meeting, 
>and hopes to gather and greet those sympathetic to free speech and 
>non-commercial internet use.
>	And if you wish to read some of our criticisms of the 
>proposal ahead of time, they are available online
>The NCUC substantive response
>http://forum.icann.org/lists/irt-final-report/pdf0VWmEpzuNr.pdf
>The NCUC response to ICANN internal procedural issues to do with the report
>http://forum.icann.org/lists/irt-final-report/pdftuYUj5owHE.pdf
>
>	Thanks in advance to anyone who can help.
>
>	Regards
>		David
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2