NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Olévié Kouami <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Olévié Kouami <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 6 Jul 2014 19:24:11 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
+1 @Alex.
-olevie-


2014-07-06 19:19 UTC, Alex Gakuru <[log in to unmask]>:
> Unless and or until a concise definition of what constitutes
> "multistakeholder," it will remain a catch-phrase/word - fluid and
> conveniently useful to push through all sorts of interests.
> On 6 Jul 2014 21:49, "Sam Lanfranco" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Milton's reference to governments using regulatory processes to repress
>> criticism by civil society will likely play out here in several areas.
>> One
>> is how domain name registration processes are structured to expose, or
>> protect, civil society from arbitrary government action. The other is how
>> domain name system issues link to handle human rights within the Internet
>> ecosystem. The issues: How domain name registration processes expose or
>> protect civil society groups; and; How Human Rights are woven into the
>> fabric of the Internet ecosystem, are still underdeveloped in terms of
>> positions and strategies.
>>
>> Both issues are most acute at the national level, and linked to wider
>> Internet policy issues. In Canada NGO's registered with the tax
>> authorities
>> as a not-for-profit cannot engage in any advocacy work around Canadian
>> government policy.  If Canadian NGO's take a position on net neutrality
>> based on human rights or innovation policy grounds, when the government
>> turns to net neutrality policy, this can put status at risk.
>>
>> The issues are even greater in developing countries. Several of the
>> larger
>> global players in Internet governance are using phrases like "legitimate
>> stakeholders", with reference to multistakeholder participation, and
>> especially with reference to civil society voices from within their own
>> countries. Civil society will be seriously handicapped if stakeholder
>> participation, and voice, are set by government.
>>
>> Expect this area to be contentious in the design of the multistakeholder
>> governance component in an acceptable IANA transition proposal. That
>> governance component is likely to be seen as a prototype for wider
>> initiatives around multistakeholder governance, initiatives where other
>> stakeholders have vested interests.
>>
>> Sam L
>>
>


-- 
Olévié Ayaovi Agbenyo KOUAMI
Responsable Département CERGI-Education (education.cergibs.com)
CEO de INTIC4DEV (http://www.intic4dev.org)
SG de ESTETIC  (http://www.estetic.tg)
Membre de ISoc (www.isoc.org <http://www.isoc.org/>) & du FOSSFA (
www.fossfa.net)
ICANN-NPOC Communications Committee Chair (http://www.icann.org/ et
http://www.npoc.org/)
BP : 851 - Tél.: (228) 90 98 86 50 / (228) 98 43 27 72
Skype : olevie1 FB : @olivier.kouami.3 Twitter : #oleviek Lomé - Togo

ATOM RSS1 RSS2