NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
UDRP: cultural imperialism
From:
Marc Schneiders <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Marc Schneiders <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:46:02 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (11 lines) 
Am I very biased as a non-native speaker of English? The UDRP case
below was conducted in English even if the rules said it should/could
be in Korean and the respondent demanded that. Reason: Respondent had
replied in English, so has enough English. So never do that?

http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2003/d2003-0989.html

It is a most curious case in other respects as well. Complainants do
not seem to have to prove anything anymore. Mere assertions suffice.
Well.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2