NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dorothy K. Gordon" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dorothy K. Gordon
Date:
Thu, 2 Jun 2016 02:57:55 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (81 lines)
Yes, a good start but with potentially unfortunate unintended consequences unless all of the elements raised; definition of terms, penalties, specifics for conference environments etc. are addressed. 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Wisdom Donkor" <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 10:30:16 PM
Subject: Re: Public Comments - Revisions to ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviors

+1 to Avri 

On Wednesday, June 1, 2016, Cheryl Langdon-Orr < [log in to unmask] > wrote: 
> I also agree with Avri on this matter... 
> 
> On 2 Jun 2016 6:49 am, "Tatiana Tropina" < [log in to unmask] > wrote: 
> 
> + 1 to Avri, 
> I think this is my problem with this public comment draft (and I left several comments about this in the doc). We do need more, but some of the issues require more time for elaboration. I don't think we can criticise ICANN for the fact that we haven't got more yet, when the document we are commenting on says that the work is in progress. 
> So agree with the positive comment that will say that it's good start but there is definitely an important work to be done further. 
> Cheers 
> Tanya 
> On 1 June 2016 at 19:24, avri doria < [log in to unmask] > wrote: 
>> 
>> On 31-May-16 15:58, Mueller, Milton L wrote: 
>> > From what I can read, I would not support the proposed policy. 
>> 
>> I find myself agreeing with the comment that we will eventually need 
>> something more. 
>> And I think that RFC7704 is a good model. 
>> 
>> But I think getting into that issue before we resolve wider 
>> accountability issues WS2 (e.g. ombudsman, or SOAC accountabity) of the 
>> CCWG-Accountabity is impracticable. I would suggest a statement that 
>> said good start, lets go with this for now, and determine after WS2, 
>> perhaps in next ATRT, whether more needs to be done. Some element of the 
>> issue could probably also feed into WS2 work. 
>> 
>> avri 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --- 
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus 
> 
> 

-- 









WISDOM DONKOR (S/N Eng.) 

E-government and Open Government Data Platforms Specialist 

National Information Technology Agency (NITA)/ 
Ghana Open Data Initiative Project. 
ICANN Fellow / Member, UN IGF MAG Member, ISOC Member, 
Freedom Online Coalition (FOC) Member, Diplo Foundation Member, 
OGP Open Data WG Member, GODAN Memember, ITAG Member 



Email: [log in to unmask] 

[log in to unmask] 

[log in to unmask] 

Skype: wisdom_dk 
facebook: facebook@wisdom_dk 

Website: www.nita.gov.gh / www.data.gov.gh 

www.isoc.gh / www.itag.org.gh 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2