NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Horacio T. Cadiz" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:17:32 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
On 03/12/2013 01:56 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As a mental exercise, what are the technical implications and risks of private/restricted TLDs other than the addition of EPP functionality for confirming when a registration is allowed?

   For closed TLDs (brand or generic), why would they need EPP if they themselves
plan to run their own registrars?

   I see no logic why a dotBrand, say .IBM, would need to go through an outside
registrar for the company to register domains for its own use.

   For closed generics, if one agrees with the premise that registration is 
restricted to those approved by the registry, why would the registry
need an external registrar at all?



-- 
Bombim Cadiz
*****************************************
*  Free/Open Source Software (FOSS) --  *
* No windows. No gates. It is open.     *
* No Bill. It is Free.                  *
*****************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2