NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Mar 2016 09:24:01 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/signed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (299 bytes) , application/pgp-signature (186 bytes)
All,

At 2016-03-17 09:22:34 +0100
Shane Kerr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I'm not sure the NCUC necessarily needs to have an opinion about the
> technology itself, and can happily wait and weigh in on the parts that
> matter to us.

Of course I meant NCSG. I blame decaffeinated coffee.

Cheers,

--
Shane


ATOM RSS1 RSS2