NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Iliya Nickelt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Iliya Nickelt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:28:05 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
On 15 Nov 2005 at 10:30, Horacio T. Cadiz wrote:
>     Does anyone have a breakdown of ICANN's revenues?

It can be found on ICANNs budget pages, eg. 
http://www.icann.org/financials/adopted-budget-12aug05.html
for the current year.

OK, let's look at the numbers. This is just a quick overview, the 
budget is relatively complex and I am no accountant. So I might have 
made mistakes.

For 2004/05 50% of ICANNs total revenue was gained by the gTLD 
transaction fees (25 cent per transaction). Verisign owns 82% of that 
market, so assumed that transaction amounts are in a linear relation to 
number of domains, in 2004/05 it paid $6.6Mio (of Mio$14.5) plus 
150.000$ from tier3, so Verisign carried 46% of the total ICANN budget. 

The other important sum, Mio$ 5.7, was paid by the registrars, as I 
understand it.

Figures for next year (Mio$):
ICANN Total: 23.5
82% of Transaction: 9.7 (of 11.8)
.net: 4.25 (29)
tier 3: .15
VS subtotal: 14.1
--> 60% of ICANN revenues

 (29) "Successor Operator .NET -- $4,351,000 based on the unapproved 
proposed agreement forms and current number of names under management."

Less than I thought, but still not bad.

	--iliya

ATOM RSS1 RSS2