NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:40:11 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
Hi,

Good point.  Many Regsistry service providers (RSP) got the community
applicants to sign exploitative contracts. We would need to make sure
that a remedial round did not just provide a more fertile field for
neo-colonialist exploitation.

avri

On 29-Sep-15 09:02, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
> Part of the power and knowledge imbalance between the new-gTLD
> "incumbent crowd", sitting like vultures (or hawks) on the sidelines
> and the "newbie crews" in Latin American, Asia and Africa will require
> more than just a re-balancing of access to resources to get into the
> game. It will also require greater knowledge and capacity to deal with
> that "incumbent crowd" when it shows up with offers to manage the
> submission process and registry services. That New York City willingly
> signed on to a 600 page contract with minimal stakeholder
> consultation, a contract that brought on a multitude of problems,
> should be a warning here. There needs to be a focused outreach effort
> to address questions and issues, so that applicants operate from a
> position of strength above and beyond just financial support.
>
> Sam Lanfranco
>
> On 29/09/2015 12:31 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I really like the question about remediation for the developmental
>> imbalance before moving on with new rounds for the  incumbent crowd.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>> On 28-Sep-15 18:58, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>>> Hi, I would like to support the topics suggested by Niels and Remmy,
>>> but I would take Remmy's point in a slightly different direction.
>>>
>>> Nielsen's report confirms that Latin America, Asia and Africa will
>>> likely be the great drivers of new gTLD acceptance and use, while most
>>> registries are still based in developed regions. There is a net
>>> transference of resources taking place from the developing to the
>>> developed world in the DNS industry. The problems that developing
>>> regions face have been extensively explained.  What is the perception
>>> of the board? In the opinion of board members, which concrete measures
>>> could be put in place? Why not even suggestions from the JAS report
>>> have been implemented yet? Would the board commit to a clear plan to
>>> address the current imbalances before a new round of applications is
>>> launched?
>>>
>>> My two cents.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> MarĂ­lia
> <rest deleted>
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>> "It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
>>> in an unjust state" -Confucius
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>> Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
>>> Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
>>> email: [log in to unmask]   Skype: slanfranco
>>> blog:  http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
>>> Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2