NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Mon, 26 Oct 2015 10:41:11 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (142 lines)
Hi,

As these were passed as part of my last meeting as a council member, I
will do my last council list forward as part of my duties as a member of
council from NCSG.

It was my honor to serve, and I wish Stefania who is now holding that
seat, the best. I also give my best regards to the renewed and incumbent
members. Have a great year.

thanks for the opportunity to serve as an NCSG representative on the
council,

avri


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	[council] GNSO Council Resolutions October 2015
Date: 	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:04:00 +0000
From: 	Glen de Saint Géry <[log in to unmask]>
To: 	GNSO Council List ([log in to unmask]) <[log in to unmask]>



Dear Councillors,

Please find the resolutions passed at the GNSO Council meeting today,
Wednesday 21 October 2015.

*1. Approval of the Data & Metrics Working Group Recommendations (non-PDP)*

WHEREAS

On 17 October 2012 the GNSO Council requested an Issue Report on metrics
and reporting (see
http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/uofr-final-31mar13-en.pdf).

On 16 May 2013 the GNSO Council deliberated a recommendation on the
Uniformity of Reporting from the Registration Abuse Policies Working
Group (RAPWG) and approved a non-PDP Working Group to consider metrics
and reporting:

“The GNSO Council further approves the creation of a drafting team to
develop a charter for a non-PDP Working Group to consider additional
methods for collecting necessary metrics and reporting from Contracted
Parties and other external resources to aid the investigation.”
(http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20130516-1). 

On 23 Jan 2014 the GNSO Council approved the charter for a Data and
Metrics for Policy Making Working Group (DMPM WG) (see
http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20140123-1).

The Data and Metrics for Policy Making WG (DMPM WG) deliberated the
issues as defined in its charter and published an Initial Report for
public comment on 29 July 2015 for the required 40 day period (see
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/data-metrics-policy-making-2015-07-29-en
<mhtml:file://C:%5CUsers%5CGlen%5CDocuments%5CMotions+21+October+2015.mht%21https://www.icann.org/public-comments/data-metrics-policy-making-2015-07-29-en>). 

The DMPM WG reviewed the input received (see public comment review tool)
and updated its report accordingly.

On 9 October 2015 the DMPM WG submitted its Final Report
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/dmpm-final-09oct15-en.pdf> to the GNSO
Council. 

RESOLVED,

The GNSO Council adopts all the consensus recommendations in the Final
Report <http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/dmpm-final-09oct15-en.pdf> and
instructs ICANN staff to begin implementation of the seven recommendations.

The GNSO Council thanks the DMPM WG for its efforts and recommends that
the WG be formally closed as a result of the adoption by the GNSO
Council of the WG’s recommendations.

The WG nevertheless requests that the WG remain available to provide
input to the GNSO Council and ICANN staff should any questions or issues
arise in relation to implementation of its recommendations prior to the
formation of an Implementation Review Team.

The GNSO Council requests ICANN staff to prepare an evaluation report
for the GNSO Council shortly after the conclusion of implementation of
this pilot effort.

*2. Process and Participation in CCWG-Accountability*

Whereas

On 13 November 2014 the GNSO approved the charter for a Cross Community
Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability);

On  3 August the Public Comment on the CCWG-Accountability 2ndDraft
Proposal was initiated, which ended on 12 September 2015;

The CCWG-Accountability has analyzed the comments received in the review
of the 2nd draft and is working toward updating its reference
implementation taking into account the concerns expressed in those comments;

and The CCWG-Accountability  is working in a considered and collegial
manner to achieve a consensus solution to ICANN Accountability;

Acknowledging

the superb and continuing leadership of CCWG-Accountability by the team
which includes the GNSO appointed co-chair Thomas Rickert, to whom we
are grateful for his time and consistent effort;

Resolved

The GNSO reiterates its support for the process that is ongoing in
CCWG-Accountability,

its commitment to participating in continuing discussions with the goal
of finding solutions with broad agreement for ICANN accountability in
preparation for IANA transition, and

to working through the process as agreed upon in the charter before
declaring support or opposition to possible outcomes.

Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.

Kind regards,

Glen

 

Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
*[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>*
*http://gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/>*

 




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

ATOM RSS1 RSS2