NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Cake <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 14 Aug 2009 06:44:02 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
At 2:36 PM -0400 13/8/09, Avri Doria wrote:
>There is an approved charter and it could be used even while asking 
>for reconsideration - we can be explicit about following through 
>with the less then acceptable charter until such time as it is 
>replaced by a proper charter is a matter of expediency and does not 
>reflect any acceptance of the SG for that charter.


	The SIC created NCSG Charter is actually not disempowering us 
directly until a second Non-Commercial Constituency is approved. In 
my opinion we should work within the rules of that charter while NCUC 
remains the sole constituency within NCSG at least.
	Are there likely to be other non-commercial constituencies 
created before Seoul?
	Regards
		David

ATOM RSS1 RSS2