NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:12:01 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Hi,

The analysis  report can be found at:

<http://forum.icann.org/lists/ncsg-charter/msg00002.html>

the NCSg-EC needs to decide whether they should send a response to the Board/SIC on the points discussed in the report.

There were 2 comments.  In addition to a typographical issue, there were three main issues:

- A challenge of the notion of allowing NCSG members to join up to 3 constituencies.  Not only was the choice of the number 3 questioned, concern was expressed that this could allow for capture of the NCSG committee structure.

- The expectation that reviewing constituency charters every two years might be too frequent given all the other work and reviews going on all the time.

- That the explanation of the voting system that discusses multiple votes per member type would be more easily understood if it were to be discussed in terms of weighted voting.

Comments?

thanks

a.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2