NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:10:55 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Re:  Is there something that will happen in the next
two weeks that makes a two-week postponement to
complete the record superfluous?

Robin,

We all know that a PDP on Domain Tasting could have
been started ages ago without a preliminary
fact-finding group having been established (as
fact-finding is part of the formal PDP process).  The
Council has consistently chosen to postpone rather
than to tackle issues head-on.  I wish to know the
root cause of this symptom.  Does the Council think
that it has too much on its plate?  If it can't handle
the job, perhaps we should be thinking about a major
restructuring of the GNSO to allow for a dynamic
coalition approach rather than the static constituency
approach that seems to favor tyranny by the majority
rather than true consensus...



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. 
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2