NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:58:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
I would hope we could simply strike the bullet point: 
"Enable the GAC and ALAC to submit objections through the Independent Objector"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Robin Gross
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 3:04 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS] FW: [ncsg-policy] Draft NCSG comments
> to GNSO Council on Rec 6
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> I've made a few suggested edits in the attached version.  Just fleshed-out
> more on the issue of the Independent Objector and clarified that our
> support for the ALAC statement was support for the concerns raised by
> ALAC.  (As I recall, we diverged on the conclusion: ALAC said "don't go
> forward" and we said "fix it and go forward")
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/5gtld-guide/msg00099.html
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin

ATOM RSS1 RSS2