NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Niels ten Oever <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Niels ten Oever <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:17:44 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
But we want someone in staff who is working on this, right? That is what
the previous report of the CCWP HR was about [0]. This cannot and should
not be done either ONLY by the board, ONLY by staff, or ONLY by the
community.

Whereas we've been having success on board engagement (after the
questions of last time), we will need to work more with staff,
henceforth this question.

Best,

Niels

[0] http://icannhumanrights.net


On 02/29/2016 04:39 AM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
> +1
> this would be my worst nightmare....
> Stephanie Perrin
> On 2016-02-28 22:32, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> - Will there be dedicated ICANN staff working on the development of a
>>> human
>>> rights policy who could also function as a vocal point on human rights?
>> Be careful with this. WE are supposed to be the vocal point on human
>> rights, don't let that function be taken over by an ICANN staff person.
>>

-- 
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9

ATOM RSS1 RSS2